🔍 Read the full analysis: Big Tech Raises Concerns About Indonesia’s Proposed AI Copyright Rules on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on monitors, keyboards and dev gear
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok urged Indonesian lawmakers to revise parts of a proposed copyright bill at a November 11 hearing, including provisions on news links, AI training and platform liability. The proposal is still being deliberated, its current text was not available, and no vote date has been announced.
Google, Meta and TikTok objected to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on November 11, arguing that provisions on news links, AI training and platform responsibility need further discussion. The bill is still being considered by lawmakers and the government, and has not become law.
The proposal would revise Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as a legislative initiative on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing it with the government. According to Reuters’ account of a July draft, the bill could require platforms to compensate news publishers for aggregating, republishing or displaying news, including in link previews, as well as for using news material in AI training. Payments would be handled through state-supervised collective management organisations.
The July draft also set out possible rules for AI-created and AI-assisted work. It would restrict AI imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, require disclosure of AI use in content, and protect AI-assisted work only when it meets a human-involvement threshold. Fully AI-generated work would not qualify for that protection under the reported draft. It also proposed that copyrighted material used to train AI models be covered by fair-use provisions or licensing. The draft was described as provisional, and the full version now under discussion was not available.
At the hearing, Google opposed payment duties for links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training data, according to reports by Suara and Kompas. It also called for intermediary safe-harbor protections. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing content and said payment duties could reduce traffic and revenue for publishers. TikTok said AI-disclosure requirements should not apply when AI is used only as an assisting tool, and also sought safe-harbor protection.
AI copyright rules draw Big Tech concerns
Google, Meta and TikTok urged lawmakers to revise parts of a proposed copyright bill. The proposal remains under discussion and has not become law.
What platforms challenged
At the November 11 hearing, companies raised concerns about rules affecting news, AI training and platform responsibility.
Links and AI licenses
Opposed payments for links and snippets, a single licensing body and mandatory AI training licenses.
Links are not republication
Said payment duties could reduce traffic and revenue for publishers.
AI assistance disclosure
Said disclosure rules should not apply when AI is used only as an assisting tool.
What the reported draft covers
A provisional July draft described several possible changes; the current bill text was not available.
Platforms could pay publishers for aggregating or displaying news, including link previews.
The draft addressed style imitation, AI-use disclosure and protection for AI-assisted work with sufficient human involvement.
Copyrighted material used to train AI models could be covered by fair-use provisions or licensing.
Why the details matter
The rules could affect how news reaches readers and how creators and AI developers use copyrighted work.
- Payment routes could compensate publishers and creators.
- Disclosure and licensing rules could shape protection and use of creative work.
- Platforms could change how they index or display Indonesian news.
- Payment allocation, human-involvement thresholds and enforcement remain unclear.
Where the bill stands
The Stakes for News and AI
The debate puts two policy goals in direct contact: compensating publishers and creators for the use of their work, while preserving the ways people find news and developers train AI systems. If lawmakers adopt payment rules for links or previews, platforms could change how they index or display Indonesian news. Google’s representative warned that the company could stop crawling, indexing and distributing local news if required to pay for links. That is a company position, not a confirmed outcome.
For publishers, a collective payment system could create a route to compensation from platforms, but its design would determine how funds are allocated and which organisations qualify. The Press Council, or Dewan Pers, told lawmakers that platforms account for 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent. Those figures were presented by the council at the hearing; the source material does not provide the measurement period or methodology.
For AI companies and creators, the proposed approach could shape access to copyrighted material, disclosure obligations and protection for work made with AI assistance. The rules could also affect how platforms handle infringement notices. These effects depend on the final language and enforcement details, which remain unsettled.
Products Worth Considering
LG UltraGear 27-inch QHD OLED Gaming Monitor, 240Hz, 0.03ms, G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, Black
Bose TV Speaker (2nd Gen) Compact Soundbar with Bluetooth and HDMI Connectivity, Black
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Portable Power Station with 200W Solar Panel
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Bill Still Under Revision
Indonesia’s proposed changes follow an existing measure, Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. At the November hearing, Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto said compliance with that regulation was low and that it had not worked as intended, according to Aktual. The proposed copyright revision would put platform and creator issues into a broader statutory framework.
The AI provisions were reported by Reuters on July 17, based on a draft authenticated by Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property. Siregar said the draft was not final and described it as the first explicit recognition of AI in Indonesia’s copyright law. The November hearing included Google, Meta, TikTok, Dewan Pers and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas. Reports from the hearing refer to provisions that may differ from the July text, so article numbers and specific wording should be treated cautiously.
“Google would have “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news if required to pay a levy on links.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
Key Terms Remain Unsettled
The current bill text was not available in the cited reporting, and the proposal has changed since the July draft. News accounts cite different versions, so the exact wording and numbering of provisions discussed at the hearing are not confirmed here. It is also unclear how lawmakers would define a sufficient level of human involvement for AI-assisted work, how any collective licensing body would distribute payments, or how broad the proposed training-data rules would be.
No vote date has been announced in the source material. The companies’ warnings and proposed alternatives are their stated positions; they do not establish what the final law will require or how platforms would respond. The Press Council’s advertising and traffic figures were reported as hearing claims, but no time window or methodology was provided.
Lawmakers Continue Bill Deliberations
Baleg and the government are expected to continue considering the copyright revision, with the companies, press representatives and licensing groups having presented their views at the November 11 hearing. The next clear milestone will be publication or circulation of an updated draft and any subsequent decision by parliament. No vote timetable has been announced, and the proposal’s provisions could still change before lawmakers act.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the proposed AI copyright rules?
No. The bill is still being deliberated by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. It has not become law, and no vote date was reported.
What are Google, Meta and TikTok objecting to?
They raised concerns about payments tied to news links and previews, AI-training licenses, platform liability and disclosure rules. Their objections differ: Google also opposes a single collective licensing body, Meta says links are not republication, and TikTok says disclosure should not cover AI used only as assistance.
What AI rules appeared in the reported draft?
Reuters reported that a July draft addressed imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, protection for AI-assisted works and the use of copyrighted material in training. The draft was provisional, and the current text was not available in the cited reporting.
Would platforms have to pay publishers for every news link?
The July draft reportedly proposed compensation for aggregation, republication and link previews, but the scope and final wording are unclear. Google said a link levy could lead it to stop distributing Indonesian news; that was a warning, not a confirmed service change.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
